• Home
  • News
  • Technical Guides
  • Troubleshooting
  • Download
  • Videos
  • Top Bloggers!
  • About

VirtualVCP IT Virtualization

rynardtspies: Worst day on the job by far! 1 day ago from TwInbox

VMware ESX VMotion vs Microsoft Hyper-V Quick Migration, are they really comparable? PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 
Written by Rynardt Spies   
Thursday, 10 April 2008 10:59

Courtesy: Virtualization.info (www.virtualization.info)

New month, new drama in the virtualization world. After the hot debate about the VMware ESX memory overcommit capabilities that involved Citrix, Microsoft and obviously VMware, this time is the turn of the virtual machine migration capabilities included in ESX and upcoming Hyper-V.

Once again Mike DiPetrillo, Specialist System Engineer of Industry Research and Competitive Analysis department at VMware, ignited the fire comparing ESX VMotion with Hyper-V Quick Migration, stating that the latter has an excessive gap (8 seconds at the best) in resuming the virtual machines and causes severe faults in networked applications like database servers or file servers (technical details are covered here and here).

This is just a reprise of an original post appeared on DiPetrillo personal blog where he questioned the reliability of Quick Migration and XenMotion technologies.

Microsoft has yet to answer (and this post will be updated to reflect what they have to say about the comparison) but in general we are safe to say that VMotion and Quick Migration are not technically comparable.

Both approaches address the same business need, providing disaster recovery capabilities, in different ways, with different benefits and shortcomings. But at least another virtualization technology addresses the same challenge, the Physical to Virtual (P2V) migration that companies like PlateSpin (now acquired by Novell) and Vizioncore offer, and it's not really comparable with VMotion or Quick Migration.

Despite that DiPetrillo compares them for a specific reason: sometimes marketing and sales departments downplay critical technical differences and pretend to put side by side two completely different implementations.
Customers get confused and start looking for further clarifications. And these days there's nothing better than a blog war to clarify the tech doubts to masses of users.

  • Add New
  • Search
  • RSS
Comments (0)
Write comment
Your Contact Details:
Comment:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img]   
:D:angry::angry-red::evil::idea::love::x:no-comments::ooo::pirate::?::(
:sleep::););)):0
Security
Security Image
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.
Joomla components by Compojoom
< Prev   Next >
 
SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

vmw-vcp_logo_260x40

vmw-vexpert_logo_223x40

 

View Rynardt Spies's profile on LinkedIn

 

Poll

ESX or ESXi in Production Environment?
 

What's the latest?

  • vSphere 4.1: VPXA Holds ESX Host at Ransom
  • Replacing vSphere SSL Certificates
  • The London UK VMware User Group Meeting on 15 July 2010
  • My thoughts on the VCDX Enterprise Admin Exam
  • New vSphere Patches Released on 10 June 2010

Popular

  • ESX 3i: Host in HA Cluster must have userworld swap enabled
  • ESX 3.5 on HP Proliant ML115 G5
  • VMware ESXi 3.5 on HP Proliant ML110 G5
  • Patching ESX 3.5 Using esxupdate
  • Cheap and quiet solution for a home-based ESX Server

Where Am I Today?

calendar_icon_s

Login to VirtualVCP

In order to leave comments, please log in.



  • Forgot your password?
  • Forgot your username?

Support VirtualVCP!

Information and Resources on this site are 100% free, however it costs money to run this site. Please help support this site by giving a donation.

Amount: 

RSS Feeds

VirtualVCP Virtualization Blog - ATOM Feed
VirtualVCP Virtualization Blog - RSS 0.91 Feed
VirtualVCP Virtualization Blog - RSS 2.0 Feed
VirtualVCP IT Virtualization, Powered by Joomla!; Joomla templates by SiteGround vBulletin hosting provider!

valid xhtml valid css